A set of prerequisites for Organizers, MDs, SDs, and tasksetters

Yes this is very much needed and start to be addressed in France, Spain and a few other. International institutions should lead these curriculum instead of lagging behind. They are in first line when it comes to event quality and CAT1 organizers. It's also usually a nice way of funding.

I agree on this, most especially in Asia, specifically in developing nations, where the sport is still developing. I've seen this in my country and some other Asian countries. For example, for a CAT 2 event accuracy, the organiser tends to allow pilots to compete with or without a sporting license, a proper national license and below the rating skills requirements. However, what the organiser will do when it comes to reporting. They will only report # of qualified pilots, the ones with a sporting license. I am not quite so sure if this kind of set-up is happening in an XC Competition here in Asia. But honestly, I have never seen this kind of set-up in Europe.

I have observed that, within this joint initiative, we can provide valuable support to the ongoing discussions taking place in the CIVL. It is essential that we establish minimum standards for competitions — not only for Category 1 (CAT 1) events, but also for Category 2 (CAT 2) events.
One of the main shortcomings in the current approach is that CIVL directs most of its attention to CAT 1 competitions, while overlooking the fact that CAT 2 events take place every month across the world.
Defining minimum standards should begin with establishing clear requirements for Meet Directors and setting consistent safety standards. However, it is important to recognize that these measures will have implications for both pilots and organizers, as their effective implementation will require adequate financial support.

I feel that there is some pressure on the organization from the governing body (PWC, CIVL) and some pilots, to have as many tasks as possible, especially if the competition risks being invalid, regardless if the conditions are borderline/marginal.

With the training, there should be clear, objective, stopped/canceled task instructions. Such as wind speed limit, a certain number of pilots DNF, a certain number of pilots call level 3. Also, possibly clearer instructions regarding tasks with OD, thunderstorms, drop out, rain, etc. Some competitions in the last year pushed the limits on safety with regards to flying near these weather patterns.

Sharing roles such as meet director, task or safety committee member, and even event photographer — while also deciding on finances, location, and political matters — is another serious issue. Especially in Cat 2 and smaller competitions, when same person is involved in all aspects and mixes technical and political responsibilities, disaster is almost inevitable.
Clear definition of standard operational procedures and roles and responsibilities is critical.

I agree. I believe this should be applied in priority to safety standard. A request to each comp to fulfill and communicate transparently and systematically for each event. Detailed safety present at take off, goal, landing and total. Helicopter présence and time reaction time. Hospital transportation time...